Correct answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government. It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.
The answer is False.
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein actually received great support from the Washington Post on this topic. Their first story about the Watergate break-in was just the beginning, as they would go on to write countless articles about President Nixon and his connection to his event. This made Woodward and Bernstein household names and also made the Washington Post a wildly popular newspaper.
2) The Maginot Line didn’t extend to The Benelux, The Germans simply went around Maginot.
Answer:
Assassination of stilicho, Aetius, and Majorian, who helped restore the west, betrayed from the inside, or killed in battle, combined with smallpox epidemics, whilst economic policies which were trash, failed to upkeep legions, and such to protect the empire's borders, which led to its collapse. The east fell, due to incompetent emperors, and the decline of trade, its debt, and the rise of venice, combined with the ottomans closing in on constantinople, and the sack of constantinople.
Explanation:
External military threats were a major cause of Rome's fall, and its effects spread across the empire. ... After Rome was divided, a powerful group known as the Huns began moving west, their numbers growing with captured prisoners and new allies. People from all walks of life were eager to reap the rewards of war. Rome fell through a gradual process because poor economic policies led to a weakened military which allowed the barbarians easy access to the empire. ... In the third century, Rome's emperors embraced harmful economic policies which led to Rome's decline
