Answer:
d) The narrator's point of view allows the reader to see Hummingbird as reasonable because he doesn't accuse Heron of eating all the fish.
Explanation:
The book is written in third-person perspective so that the reader may see the whole narrative rather than just one character's point of view. Heron and Hummingbird are well-explained by the narrator. Heron loves Hummingbird regardless of whether he eats all the fish or not, thus Hummingbird is not upset with Heron. Also crucial is the fact that this is a short narrative, but it's vital to emphasize that there are other viewpoints in every situation.
Answer:
Explanation:
Melville’s story is an allegory that conveys his criticism of Christian missionaries. Melville uses several biblical, scientific, mythological, and historical allusions to build his allegory. The lightning-rod man represents Christian missionaries, while the narrator represents Melville’s beliefs. According to him, missionaries are displacing and destroying the cultures they are attempting to convert rather than bringing them true spirituality. Although the narrator isn’t influenced by the lightning-rod man, he is saddened and worried to see his neighbors fall prey to the missionaries' trap. The narrator tries to dissuade his neighbors from believing in the lightning-rod man, who continues to thrive as he “trades with the fears of men.” Unlike many others of the time period, Melville believes in being God-loving, not God-fearing. :) Hope this helped.
What are you looking for like definitions or in your own words
