Cassius wants brutus (Caesar's nephew) to kill Caesar in the senate house with a whole bunch of other senators...
Answer: sum of net export of Germany and China is 150 US Billion dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
Net exports are obtained by subtracting total imports from total exports; a negative net export means the country imported more goods than it exported.
From the Bar graph it looks like that
net export of germany in US Billion dollars = 30
Also From the Bar graph it looks like that
net export of China in US Billion dollars = 120
we need to find sum of net export of Germany and China
so we will add net export of both countries
sum of net export of Germany and China in US Billion dollars
= 30 + 120
= 150
sum of net export of Germany and China is 150 US Billion dollars
ocabanga44 and 11 more users found this answer helpful
Explanation:
The paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
<h3>What is paraphrasing?</h3>
Paraphrasing connotes the restatement of a text or passage using different words from the author's.
While the meaning or idea of the paraphrased passage should be retained, the paraphrased expression should employ different words.
<h3>What are some paraphrasing mistakes?</h3>
Some of the paraphrasing mistakes that some writers make include:
- Rearranging the word order
- Changing the verb tenses
- Using synonyms to replace some words
- Using passive voices instead of active voices
- Failure to acknowledge the source of the original text.
Thus, the paraphrasing mistake that Ania makes is a. She does not restate the ideas in her own words.
Learn more about paraphrasing and paraphrasing mistakes at brainly.com/question/5032491 and brainly.com/question/27922122
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. objective
Explanation:
To say that someone is 'good' or 'strong' is not objective because it is based on your own values, perceptions and judgement. So, someone else might have a very different perception of those adjectives based on his own experience and values.
It's not objective, it's subjective, because it depends of the subject (individual) saying those words, on what they define is good, on what they believe is strong and so on.
Objective means it's something that everyone agrees on, that has a general consensus among the population. For example, saying someone is beautiful/handsome implies your own criteria of beauty, which may or may not be shared by others. But if you say someone is tall, then it can be measured and quantified to determine if it's really the case or not, it's not dependent on someone's opinion or feelings.
I would choose a. Simply because the author talks about it as if it's all that really ever existed and that nature cannot take over what it is not. However, it goes on about seeing how erosion and rot can affect such things and tries to compare it to things in nature as if it were nature itself.
