Answer:
I would say C read about the topic of discussion
Explanation:
it says before the group discussion so.. also u would have way for info to discuss
Answer:
the answer is a
Explanation:
this is a very easy question lol
Answer:
The case the United States v. Susan B. Anthony was a criminal case taken up against Susan B. Anthony after she attempted to vote. She was found guilty and told to pay a $100 fine, which she adamantly refused. One argument that the defendant, Susan B. Anthony, had was that the fourteenth amendment said that all people born in the united states were citizens and that states could not infringe on their "privileges and immunities of citizens" which includes voting (as seen in the fifteenth amendment). However, the court argued that those only pertained to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as children were citizens but could not vote. Then, when faced with the fifteenth amendment the court said that since nowhere in the amendment is sex listed, women's right to vote was not protected.
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
