Answer: D. he explains the need for healing the nation
Explanation:
Basis of the answer: <u>to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations</u>
Moving to a new place can be tough on anyone, especially if the move is to a new state. At the start if a new move, you may think that many things will be different in your life, and that nothing will be enjoyable ever again. Your surroundings may have to change. Your good friends and favorite activities, however, do not. You can still maintain your friendships through a variety of technological ways, which may include talking on a cell phone, writing an email, and seeing a friend on video chat. Technology can help you stay in contact and be up to date with everything that your friends are doing. You can even continue doing your favorite activities, which might include sports. Most towns and cities have their own teams, leagues, or clubs for popular activities, So, you really don't have to give up what you love to do. Knowing that your friends and activities do not have to change can help you be more open to the idea of moving.
Answer:
The St. Louis Cardinals have a rich history of success, although their offense this year was awful.
Explanation:
The two sentences are expressing contrasting ideas. The first sentence offers a type of compliment to the St. Louis Cardinals. If they have a rich history of success, however, we would not expect the criticism that comes in the second sentence. We are surprised to hear that their offense was awful this year.
<u>To help express such contrast and, at the same time, make the second sentence a subordinate clause, we should choose an appropriate subordinating conjunction. The conjunctions that can help us do that are "though", "even though", and "although", among others. Therefore:</u>
The St. Louis Cardinals have a rich history of success, although their offense this year was awful.
NOTE: We may be tempted to use "but" instead of "although". We need to keep in mind that "but" is a coordinating conjunction, not a subordinating one. That is why it cannot be used here.
I say talk about economic policy. Argue for a position you believe in (be it Socialism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism, or whatever). I would start by using a anecdote that described the issue using the negative consequences of embracing the other perspective, immediately tarnishing the person's first impression of the opposite ideology. Then, I would involve logos by saying things like "just think about it, and you'll realize it makes perfect sense" and explaining my position as though it were a formula. Ethos would come into the picture when I mention the opinions of professionals and scholars who I've hand=picked to agree with me on the topic. Pathos has already been used in the form of the beginning anecdote, a "sob story" so to speak.
Hope that I helped!
