Answer:
- Past genetic knowledge has mostly been replaced.
- Early researchers were hampered by a lack of knowledge of DNA structure and function.
Explanation:
Genetics is the part of biology that studies heredity, that is, how traits are passed down from generation to generation. Many technologies have been created so that scientific research can find new genetic discoveries and facilitate our understanding on this subject.
The first scientific research that tried to explain genetic phenomena was created long ago, but this research generated an archaic knowledge that can be replaced thanks to technology and scientific advancement in this area. This archaic knowledge is the result of research where researchers were unaware of the existence of the DNA molecule, which is the main vehicle in the transmission of heredity.
Unbeknownst to DNA, these researchers attributed heredity to elements that do not correspond with what actually happens, but we cannot dismiss the importance of such research for the technologies and genetic knowledge we have today.
Answer: option B) Sympatric speciation is best described as a random event that disrupts the allele frequencies in a population.
Explanation:
Sympatric speciation is an event/situation whereby organisms of the same species:
- live in the same territory or nearby territories ( i.e do not live in geographical isolation)
- DO NOT interbreed, but select a sexual mate from a much diverse territory to yiels new species or offsprings that are genetically different from their parents, and causing uneven gene flow or disruption of alleles known to have been prevalent among the parent organisms
So, only option B is true
<span>Empirical studies are results of analysis of data based on actual observation or experiences in the field. When conducting an empirical study, quantitative and qualitative approaches are employed, including:</span>
<span>1. </span><span>Providing data</span>
<span>2. </span>Emphasizes features of a new condition
<span>3. </span>Describes the current status of existing condition
<span>4. </span>Highlight associations between variables, but cannot establish causality, and
<span>5. </span>Suggest hypotheses which can be tested in analytical studies
<span>Qualitative empirical studies provide deep contextual data to help us understand a situation, but it cannot be used to establish its prevalence or incidence. It cannot be generalized also to highlight the statistical relationship between variables. If the aim is to measure the relationship, the quantitative methods should be used. A cross-sectional survey with large sample size is needed to describe the who, what, and where of a situation. Still, it cannot answer the why question. In order to answer the question of "why", an analytical or experimental study is needed. Experimental error is an important consideration here considering lapses or inaccuracies in the qualitative and quantitative data. </span>
They should probably be open-minded, as they have to find new scientific discoveries and such.
Answer:
carbon dioxide
Explanation:
we inhale oxygen and exhale the carbon dioxide
