Except for the statement A, all other statements can be argued to be negative outcomes of the invention of the cotton gin. But in the need to choose only two, the most negative are C and D.
Despite the cotton gin making processing faster, it produced more demand for labor instead of less. The cotton production's radical growth was based primarily on slave labor. Thus:
Statements B and E are negative since the prominence of the United States in the world cotton production, due to a tremendous increase in production, was reached based on a more violent exploration of slave labor.
Statements C and D refer more directly to negative outcomes of the cotton gin. They explain how numbers in statements B and E were achieved. Slave labor was a repudiation of black people's status as humans. It was obtained through continuous violence and torture, and it increased due to the invention of the cotton gin.
Answer:
C. sell unoccupied lands.
Explanation:
The Indian Appropriations Act comprises of several landmark acts that were passed by the Congress of the United States of America between the 19th and 20th century.
In 1885, Congress passed an act known as the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 so as to mitigate or forestall several attempts of encroachment into the Indian Territory by the Oklahoman Boomers. Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 was mainly to avail the Indians and all Indian tribes the ability to sell any unoccupied land in their possession or have claimed to be theirs.
Hence, the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 encouraged American Indians to sell unoccupied lands.
The trade of cotton, hope this helps
Answer:
Austria - Hungarian, Czech, and Slovak nationalists wanted their own states.
Prussia - Liberals forced the king to accept a new constitution and an assembly.
France - Crowds rioted after the king refused to allow greater voting rights.
Explanation:
I just took it. Also, sorry for seeing this late I wish I could have helped you in time but I hope this helps all the other people struggling with this question <3
