Answer:
The 3rd option
Step-by-step explanation:
To prove that 2 triangles are similar, we need to prove that 2 pairs of their angle measurements are congruent.
This is because all triangles have 180 degrees, so if 2 pairs are congruent, the remaining angles will also be congruent
We know that m<D=m<E
We also know that m<DCA=m<ECB because they are vertical angles.
Vertical angles are always congruent.
Therefore, the triangles are similar.
The correct similarity statement would be 1, since <D corresponds with <E.
Now let's look at the 3rd Statement. To prove that two lines are similar, we would have to prove that their alternate interior angles are congruent.
A pair of alternate interior angles would be <D and B or or <E and <A
There is no way to prove this, since we do not know any of the angle or that measurements or if the triangles are isosceles triangles.
Hence, the correct choice would be 1 only.
Addition
A. X=12
B. S=10
C. Y=34
D. T=12
Subtraction
A. X=8
B. S=2
C. Y=14
D. T=6
Answer:
Just took the quiz, answer is 6.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes, the test was conducted with a risk of a type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we reject the null hypothesis, does this mean that we have proved it to be false beyond all doubt? Explain your answer.
Yes, for a null hypothesis to be rejected, it has being proven beyond all doubt that the null hypothesis will not work. the normal distribution has being used for the probability calculation.
if the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, a type I error as occur.
In general terms:
‘a hypothesis has been rejected when it should have been accepted’. When this occurs, it is called a type I error.
1. Split the second term in 6x^2 - 11x - 35 into two terms
6x^2 + 10x - 21x - 35
2. Factor out common terms in the first two terms, then in the last two terms
2x(3x + 5) - 7(3x + 5)
3. Factor out the common term 3x + 5
(2x - 7)
