Answer:
I think the answer is public nuisance.
Explanation:
I believe this because it is not an invasion of privacy at all, it can't be trespassing because she is not trespassing, it is not intentional even though she did ignore your claims.
Hope this helps.
The answer is 8th Amendment
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
I will answer for the points...
Explanation:
A person under the age of 21
