I think its the second one
Answer:
The defendant's background
Explanation:
I would want to know what they are all about and what they have done in the past. This would help me make my decision of the best possible sentence.
The answer is A is just is because it's logic
Answer:
true, i think
Explanation:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Answer:
Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.
Explanation:
