Answer:
No they should not be held accountable.
Explanation:
When the actions were taken in the past it was legal, now that it is illegal the companies should not be held accountable. If they are it will set a bad precedent that will affect a lot of companies.
In the case of GE that did experiments on prisoners to test effects of irradiation however, even if criminal charges are not brought against them, they can face charges. What they did was wrong even if it was legal then.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Orientation.
Explanation:
The primary organization-specific factors are <em>orientation, size of the organization, </em>and<em> degree of centralization</em>. Orientation <em>refers to the function of a company that controls the decisions in regards to purchases</em>. The size of the organization implies decision making will be more centralized in larger firms while more decentralized in smaller firms. Finally, the degree of centralization states that even in highly autonomous corporations, some purchases might be subject to the approval of a manager who confirms the need for the assets being acquired.
<em>Because in Anchor Inc. the purchase decisions are made by engineers the orientation organization-specific factor is more relevant in that company</em>.
<span>Three people share the profit and losses as follows.Total ratio is 100. Hendrick and Mitch each get 2/5 of the profit or suffer 2/5 of the loss i. e (40/100) as well while redding gets 1/5 i. e (20/100). Redding can contribute no more than one-fifth of the liqudated capital. The$20, 000 in excess liability will be distributed in proportion to their ratios. 2/5 * 20, 000 = $8, 000 each for Hendrick and Mitcherum while redding gets 1/5 * 20, 000 = $4000. If the non cash assest is sold Hendrick would receive 2/5 * 50, 000 = 100000/5 = $20, 000. The minmum hendrick would receive would be $20, 000 + $8, 000 = $28, 000</span>
Answer:
The euro return to investing directly in euros is 180 5% 10% 360 = × ÷ , so the euros available in 180 days is EUR10,000,000 × 1.05 = EUR10,500,000. Alternatively, the EUR10,000,000 can be converted into Swiss francs at the spot rate of EUR1.1960/CHF. The Swiss francs purchased would equal EUR10,000,000 / EUR1.1960/CHF = CHF8,361,204. This amount of Swiss francs can be invested to provide a 180 4% 8% 360 = × ÷ return over the next 180 days. Hence, interest plus principal on the Swiss francs is CHF8,361,204 × 1.04 = CHF8,695,652. If we sell this amount of Swiss francs forward for euros at the 180-day forward rate of EUR1.2024/CHF, we get a euro
Subscribe to unlock
return of CHF8,695,652 ×EUR1.2024/CHF = EUR10,455,652. This is less than the return from investing directly in euros.If these were the actual market prices, you should expect investors to do covered interest arbitrages. Investors would borrow Swiss francs, which would tend to drive the CHF interest rate up; they would sell the Swiss francs for euros in the spot foreign exchange market, which would tend to lower the spot rate of EUR/CHF; they would deposit euros.
Explanation:
Answer:
they are determined by consumer's perceptions, but influenced by the process of branding is answer.
Explanation:
I hope it's helpful!
