Answer:
a. As per the situation sales exceed production absorption costing income from operations is lesser than variable costing income from operations.
b. $776,160
Explanation:
a. As per the situation sales exceed production absorption costing income from operations is lesser than variable costing income from operations
b. Given that
Beginning inventory = 52,800
Fixed manufacturing costs = $14.70 per unit
Total Beginning inventory = Beginning inventory × Fixed manufacturing costs
= 52,800 × $14.70 per unit
= $776,160
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
Answer:
Refrain from introducing evidence of prior oral agreements that occurred before or while the agreement was being reduced to its final form in order to alter the terms of the existing contract and you will have no disputes.
Cheers!
The aspect of the SMART goal that is missing is that of TARGET DATE.
SMART goals refers to goals that are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Result oriented and Time bound. The aspect of the time bound was not included in the scenario given in the question.
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
