1) it can be vetoed
2) the resident can sign it and it will atomaticlly become a law
3) if the president doesnt sign or veto with in 10 days it can become a law
4) <span>if the congress adjourns before the president signs the bill, the bill dies</span>
Answer:
d. openness to experience
Explanation:
<u>People who are more open to new experiences and ideas are easier to hear and receive a persuasive argument in the discussion. </u>
Those who are<em> more open to new experiences</em>, <em>who enjoy learning</em> and <em>have more need to evaluate things</em> will take the arguments into the account, review them, and, if they prove to be useful and true for them, to accept them.
People who show the need for consistency and high attitude importance are more difficult to persuade. <u>Those who are more closed off and who have their mindset on things are always more difficult to revive the well-rounded argument. </u>
Explicit means stated clearly with plenty of detail, and and leaving no possible room for confusion. Some synonyms for the word explicit include; clear, direct, straightforward, clear cut, and obvious. That’s right, obvious is a synonym! The correct answer is B, obvious! Hope this helped!
1) i think the answer is A, because Andrew Jackson supported slavery.
2) c?
3) I think the answer for this is C?
Please show me a picture of the passage you read from ❤️❤️.
Explanation:
translation = Why are religious and moral norms not coercible?
The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose “religion” and “morality” into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts—in particular, sanitized conceptions of “prosocial” behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.