1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
15

According to MLK, how has the US treated the people of Vietnam? Use at least 3 examples.​

History
1 answer:
Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

While King was personally opposed to the war, he was concerned that publicly criticizing U.S. foreign policy would damage his relationship with President Lyndon B. Johnson, who had been instrumental in passing civil rights legislation and who had declared in April 1965 that he was willing to negotiate a diplomatic end to the war in Vietnam. Though he avoided condemning the war outright, at the August 1965 annual Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) convention King called for a halt to bombing in North Vietnam, urged that the United Nations be empowered to mediate the conflict, and told the crowd that “what is required is a small first step that may establish a new spirit of mutual confidence … a step capable of breaking the cycle of mistrust, violence and war” (King, 12 August 1965). He supported Johnson’s calls for diplomatic negotiations and economic development as the beginnings of such a step. Later that year King framed the issue of war in Vietnam as a moral issue: “As a minister of the gospel,” he said, “I consider war an evil. I must cry out when I see war escalated at any point” (“Opposes Vietnam War”).

King’s opposition to the war provoked criticism from members of Congress, the press, and from his civil rights colleagues who argued that expanding his civil rights message to include foreign affairs would harm the black freedom struggle in America. Fearful of being labeled a Communist, which would diminish the impact of his civil rights work, King tempered his criticism of U.S. policy in Vietnam through late 1965 and 1966. His wife, Coretta Scott King, took a more active role in opposing the war, speaking at a rally at the Washington Monument on 27 November 1965 with Benjamin Spock, the renowned pediatrician and anti-war activist, and joined in other demonstrations.

In December 1966, testifying before a congressional subcommittee on budget priorities, King argued for a “rebalancing” of fiscal priorities away from America’s “obsession” with Vietnam and toward greater support for anti-poverty programs at home (Semple, “Dr. King Scores Poverty”). King led his first anti-war march in Chicago on 25 March 1967, and reinforced the connection between war abroad and injustice at home: “The bombs in Vietnam explode at home—they destroy the dream and possibility for a decent America” (“Dr. King Leads Chicago”). A few days later, King made it clear that his peace work was not undertaken as the leader of the SCLC, but “as an individual, as a clergyman, as one who is greatly concerned about peace” (“Dr. King to Weigh Civil Disobedience”).

Less than two weeks after leading his first Vietnam demonstration, on 4 April 1967, King made his best known and most comprehensive statement against the war. Seeking to reduce the potential backlash by framing his speech within the context of religious objection to war, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 people at Riverside Church in New York City. King delivered a speech entitled “Beyond Vietnam,” pointing out that the war effort was “taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem” (King, “Beyond Vietnam,” 143).

Although the peace community lauded King’s willingness to take a public stand against the war in Vietnam, many within the civil rights movement further distanced themselves from his stance. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, for example, issued a statement against merging the civil rights and peace movements. Undeterred, King, Spock, and Harry Belafonte led 10,000 demonstrators on an anti-war march to the United Nations on 15 April 1967.

During the last year of his life, King worked with Spock to develop “Vietnam Summer,” a volunteer project to increase grassroots peace activism in time for the 1968 elections. King linked his anti-war and civil rights work in speeches throughout the country, where he described the three problems he saw plaguing the nation: racism, poverty, and the war in Vietnam. In his last Sunday sermon, delivered at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on 31 March 1968, King said that he was “convinced that [Vietnam] is one of the most unjust wars that has ever been fought in the history of the world” (King, “Remaining Awake,” 219). Nearly five years after King’s assassination, American troops withdrew from Vietnam and a peace treaty declared South and North Vietnam independent of each other.

You might be interested in
50 points!!!!
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

I think it's D

Explanation:

Monroe's primary concern was the welfare of Latin American countries.

I hope it helps you...

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Congress was created by the:
Artemon [7]
By the United States in March 4, 1789
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following explains why European countries would offer incentives to persuade people to move to the colonies?
Levart [38]
I believe it was because they wanted to control the new world :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the US Congress agree to war with Germany
bixtya [17]
America Declares War on Germany<span>, </span>1917<span>. At 8:30 on the evening of April 2, </span>1917<span>, President Wilson appeared before a joint session of </span>Congress<span> and asked for a </span>declaration<span> of </span>war<span> against </span>Germany<span> in order to "make the world safe for democracy."</span>
6 0
3 years ago
When Lincoln mentions problems that cannot be solved individually, what kinds of
STALIN [3.7K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The question does not provide options or another specific reference. However, we can comment on the following.

Abraham Lincoln considered that the problems that couldn't be solved individually were the issue of slavery in the southern states, the unresolved conflicts that the entrance of Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas to the Union, and the idea of some states to secede from the Union.

Those are my three examples.

Abraham Lincoln was very aware of those above-mentioned issues. He even expressed in one of his speeches as a Republican candidate that "A house divided against itself, cannot stand."

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • !!!!!ASAP!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Why did monopolies happen during the Gilded Ages?
    14·1 answer
  • Right and first answer gets brainliest answer!​
    10·2 answers
  • Which policy did the populist party support to raise crop pieces
    6·1 answer
  • BRAIN LIEST
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not an appropriate language learning opportunity in the early childhood setting
    8·1 answer
  • Why is 1854 a landmark in the history of tall building?
    15·1 answer
  • What type of government does Portugal have?
    8·1 answer
  • What did African Americans do in World War One
    8·1 answer
  • What did nobles agree to give up as revolutionary groups took over Paris?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!