Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
B. giving full attention to something else.
Explanation:
A distraction is something that prevents someone from giving full attention to something else. You must give your full attention to things in life, otherwise it seems like you don't care.
Because it is a smart schools and lawyers that study there turn out to hae a good life with lots of wealth. So harvard is generally considered good
Answer:
liability.
Explanation:
A known liability arises from a situation with little uncertainty, with set agreements, contracts, or laws. These liabilities are measurable.
