Answer:
b. g (x) = 9f (0)
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it help
Answer:
x > - 5
x < 10
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide 7x>-35 by 7
Divide - 5x>-50 by - 5
Since we divide by a negative whe change the inequality sign.
3 x (7+2) all you have to do is add 7+2 and that is 9 and then you have to multiply 3 x 9
Answers:
- Translate
- Reflect
- Rotate
- Dilate
This can be stated in any order
============================================
Explanation:
In geometry, a translation is where you slide a point or figure some distance left, right, up or down.
A reflection will mirror a point over a line, or you could mirror a point over another point.
A rotation turns a point around a fixed center point.
A dilation scales the figure to be larger or smaller.
The first three transformations mentioned (translation, reflection, rotation) are known as rigid transformations. They keep the figure the same size and shape. A dilation will keep the same shape, but the size will be different, so the before and after figures are not congruent when you apply a dilation.
1) Data:
Meal calories consumed
Breakfast 400 cal
Lunch 350 cal
Dinner x
------------------
Total 400 + 350 + x = 750 + x
2) Equation: <span>
She consumes 2/3 of her daily calories at dinner => (2/3)[750+x] = x
3) Analyze each statement:
</span><span>a) Lena
consumed 1500 cal at dinner.
Solve the equation to find if the statement is true:
</span>
<span><span>(2/3)[750+x] = x</span>
2(750+x) = 3x
1500 + 2x = 3x
1500 = 3x - 2x
x = 1500
Conclusión: TRUE stament.
b) Do you equation 2/3 (x+400+350)=x can be
used to model the situation.
That is the same equation that I found above.
Conclusion: TRUE statement
c) Lena consumed 500 cal at dinner.
She consumed (2/3) * 1500 = 500 cal
Conclusion: TRUE statement
d) Lena
consumed 1000 cal at dinner.
No, we calculated that she consumed 500 cal at dinner.
Conclusion: FALSE statement
e) The equation 2/3(x)=x(400+350) can be used
to model the situation.
No: (2/3) x = 500 and x(400+350) = 500*750 = 375,00, which are not equal.
Conclusion: FALSE statement.
f) The equation 2/3x(400+350)=x Can’t be used to
model the situation
No: in that equation the variable x cancels out because it appears a factor at both sides.
</span>Conclusion: TRUE statement
