Answer:
* Leaders of the established 1966 military coup, including armed force officials Colonel E.K. Kotoka, Major A.A. Afrifa, Lieutenant General (resigned) J.A. Ankra, and Police Controller General J.W.K. Harlley, legitimized their takeover by charging that the CPP organization was harsh and degenerate. They were similarly upset by Kwame Nkrumah's forceful contribution in African legislative issues and by his conviction that Ghanaian soldiers could be sent anyplace in Africa to battle alleged freedom wars, despite the fact that they never did as such.
* Most importantly, they highlighted the nonappearance of vote based practices in the country a circumstance they guaranteed had influenced the confidence of the military. As indicated by Broad Kotoka, the military coup of 1966 was a patriot one since it freed the country from Nkrumah's tyranny an announcement that was upheld by Alex Quaison Sackey, Nkrumah's previous priest of international concerns.
Explanation:
Regardless of the huge political changes that were achieved by the topple of Kwame Nkrumah, numerous issues remained. For instance, the fundamental ethnic and provincial divisions inside the general public must be tended to. The clear soul of public solidarity that appeared to have created during the Nkrumah years ended up having brought about part from his coercive powers just as from his allure.
As an outcome, progressive new pioneers confronted the issue of producing dissimilar individual, ethnic, and sectional interests into a country with shared character and interests. The financial weights, exasperated by what some depicted as past lavishness, injured every future government's capacity to cultivate the fast advancement expected to fulfill even negligible mainstream requests for a superior life. The dread of a resurgence of an excessively solid focal position kept on ruling the sacred plan and to infest the considering many taught, politically disapproved of Ghanaian s. Others, in any case, felt that a solid government was basic.
