Answer:
yhjgdfkjgtsfoggtttttttttttttttttttttttt
\gogglez
Explanation:
reclembantable
calblzlo
I think one about the significant issues that Japan confronts these days is not overpopulation. The Japanese populace has been declining over the previous decade or somewhere in the vicinity. The issue is not the quantity of individuals but rather the make-up of that populace.
The rate of Japanese individuals resigning or drawing near to retirement age has been expanding for quite a long time. Nowadays, there are more "old" individuals in Japan than there are "youthful" individuals. Japanese ladies are holding up longer to get hitched and couples simply are having the same number of youngsters as they did decades before.
This has put a tremendous strain on the Social Welfare framework on the grounds that there are essentially insufficient Japanese youngsters paying annuity premiums, charges or whatever to take care of the wellbeing expense and benefits advantages of every one of the individuals who either as of now have or will in the blink of an eye be resigning.
I don't get it, is this a question or an answer? either way it's correct because during that time the Egyptian Empire was still very much active, but I can't recall them spreading to the Middle East
The answer is C. It is not direct but is implied through the elastic clause
