Could it be that you mistyped and what you meant was:
Who heads up the department of Justice under the executive branch?
The head of the Department of Justice (which is part of the executive branch, not the judicial), is the Attorney General. Currently, the Attorney General is Loretta Lynch.
<span />
Answer:
It is considered as an <em>unanticipated problem.
</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
An unanticipated problem occurs when an investigation arises in a situation that was not considered in advance by the investigator.
In this investigation, which is a study with drugs, the risks rise, and an unforeseen event arises. Therefore the investigator must modify the informed consent, and the subjects must reaffirm the same to continue in the study.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
advocate
Explanation:
Anti-racism
This is simply the act of genuinely standing against and opposing of racism by advocating for changes in political, economic, and social life etc. This is the practice of confronting, eradicating racism. Anti-racism tends to be an individualized approach, and set up in opposition to individual racist behaviors and impacts.
An Advocate
This is an individual who is actively pleading for a cause and also putting an idea forward. They simply want to shape public perception to effect change that sometimes do not require changes in law.
It aims to raise public awareness and acceptance as well as influence public policy and resource allocations. Advocacy also mean to speak on behalf of another person by recommending or punishing. They simply to create a just society in which all people have equal opportunities and resources to push toward their own goals.
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
Answer:
Losing telephone privileges for breaking curfew
Explanation:
Punishment by removal is also called Negative removal. It involves the removal of a good and very pleasant stimulus after a repulsive or displeasing behavior has been exhibited. The aim of the punishment is to reduce such behavior. The punishment is usually meted out to children in a bid to correct them knowing fully well if they exhibit such behavior again then such privileges will be taken away from them.
