Answer:
See answer below
Step-by-step explanation:
You are missing data such as the angle of the boat next to Dolores. I found an exercise similar to this, and I'm going to show it here and use the missing data to show you how to do it:
<u>Dolores is on a bridge that is 45 feet above a lake. She sees a boat at a 30 degree angle of depression. What is Dolores' approximate horizontal distance from the boat?</u>
<u></u>
According to that, I will use the angle of 30° to do this, but the distance of 42 feet.
Now, we can see this as a triangle. Dolores is on a bridge 42 feet above a lake, this 42 feet distance should be one side of the triangle (The vertical forming the 90° angle), and the boat that is on the lake, is seen with an angle of 30°. So the distance of the boat, to the spot where dolores is, under the bridge would be the horizontal side.
With this, we have the opposite side (a) and the adyacent side (b) of the triangle, and we have the angle, therefore:
tanα = a/b
Replacing we have:
tan30° = 42/b
b = 42 / tan30°
b = 72.75 feet
Hope this helps
Answer:
![r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn%28%5Csum%20xy%29-%28%5Csum%20x%29%28%5Csum%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Bn%5Csum%20x%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20x%29%5E2%5D%5Bn%5Csum%20y%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20y%29%5E2%5D%7D%7D)
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:
And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:
The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:
And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
X=-3y+6 That is the answer.
Answer:
C.) -7x - 5y = -48
Step-by-step explanation:
slope AB = (y2 - y1)/(x2-x1)
= {4-(-1)}/{4-(-3)} = 4+1/4+3 = 5/7
slope of BC = -1 ÷ 5/7 = -1 × 7/5 = -7/5
taking -7x - 5y = -48
-5y = 7x -48
y = 7x/-5 - 48
y = -7/5x -48
I set it up as an equation. 1/4x = 1/7x + 3. After you solve it out, it’s 28.
