In general? or in a piece of text?
Rosa Parks is considered a hero because she encouraged people to end slavery. You might be thinking how she did that....
On a day, Parks got on a bus. Of-coarse, later, a white man wanted her seat. They made they whites go at the front of the bus, and the others at the back. Parks did not like this rule. She wanted everyone to be free. She wanted freedom and rights.
The man told her to get off the seat. She refused! Then, they all got mad. She would not give up her seat. It is said that they even physically tried to remove her from that seat!
Later, she was taken to Jail. She then encouraged African-Americans to boycott white buses, which made a HUGE difference in the white buses' pay.
That made her a hero was that her story changed many things. She was a civil rights activist, which means she wanted rights for all.
Here is one of her quotes that I thought was awesome:- "Have you ever been hurt and the place tries to heal a bit, and you just pull the scar off of it over and over again."
La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que la pregunta no incluye opciones, podemos decir que los motivos político-económicos por los que algunos miembros de la familia de Francisco I. Madero, incluyendo al padre de éste, fueran contrarios al movimiento revolucionario son los siguientes.
Los padres de Francisco Ignacio Madero era gente acaudalada del norte del país. Eso significa que Madero provenía de una familia de mucho dinero, dueños de varias empresas el el norte de México y que por ende, tenían una imagen y reputación que cuidar. Por esa razón, y para no comprometer su nombre ni sus negocios, es que el padre y familiares de Francisco Ignacio Madero se opusieron al levantamiento en armas y no quisieron apoyar el movimiento llamado la Revolución Mexicana que el propio Madero inició en 1910.
The answer is A be tried to make sure that poverty was demolished.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the authors of the declaration partially succeeded in providing a perfectly unbiased account of the king's actions. However, when reading the text of the Declaration, you can notice some biased when using adjectives and sentences that describe the King of England's offenses to the American colonies.
For example, I want to share the following evidence from the text. The following excerpt of the Declaration: <em>"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."</em>
When you read it, you can notice the kinds of words Thomas Jefferson used to disqualify the decisions of the British government. Words lie "abuses," "usurpations," and "despotism," are strong words that were chosen by the framers of the Declaration to appeal to the emotions of the colonists.
