Answer:
In the cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST), people use two major psychological systems simultaneously to adapt to the world. The <u>rational system</u> includes language, logic, and systematized, factual knowledge; the <u>experiential system</u> is tied closely to emotion and assumed to be the way other animals think (and how our prehuman ancestors also thought).
Explanation:
Cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST) seeks to explain unconscious prossesing and the seemingly irrational, emotion-driven sectors of mind.
It has rational system and experiential system.
Rational involves analytical, intentional and effortful system, using logic and evidence.
Experientialinbolves emotionally-based system. Processes information rapidly and effortlessly. Associative, analogical , relies on heuristics.
To resolve a dispute in nonbinding arbitration, Alyson in Baltimore and Chuck in Denver utilize eResolve, an online dispute resolution (ODR) service. This limits these parties' recourse to the courts: <u>a) not at all</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Non-binding arbitration is a type of arbitration in which the authority makes a determination of the rights of the parties to the disagreement. Online dispute resolution service acts as a third person to resolve the dispute in nonbinding arbitration.
Online dispute resolution (ODR) is one of the dispute resolution services in which technology is used to resolve the disputes between the concerned as soon as possible. Dispute between two parties is solved through online mediation.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must
a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."
Answer:
b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.
In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.
Answer:
the answer is B. hope i could help yall :)
