If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
True, Andrew Jackson was the most openly partisan and politically involved president in history up to that point.
A partisan is an ardent supporter of a political party or army. In multi-party systems, the term refers to people who strongly support the policies of their party and are unwilling to compromise with political opponents. A political partisan is not the same as a military partisan.
This is similar to agenda bias in that it exists primarily when the emphasis is on politicians and how they choose to cover and present preferred policy discussions and issues.
To know more about partisans, click here.
brainly.com/question/18108257
#SPJ4
Answer:
mainly common citizens and the middle class
Explanation:
Answer:
Even among cities, density values can vary considerably from one city to another. Population density allows for broad comparison of settlement intensity across geographic areas. In the U.S., population density is typically expressed as the number of people per square mile of land area
C) Because he called for blacks being allowed the right vote just like white men.
