Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
It begins with the Israelites in slavery. Their prophet Moses leads them out of Egypt and through the wilderness to Mount Sinai, where Yahweh reveals himself to his people and establishes the Mosaic covenant: they are to keep his torah
My research shows that the domestication of plants started around 9,000 years ago. Fig trees, variety of wheat and peas in the Near East were first 9,000 years ago. Barley and chickpeas around 8,500 years ago. These were followed by rice in asia 8,000 years ago along with potatoe, beans and squash in Central and South America also around 8,000 years ago.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I don't really have an explanation for my answer. I'm just hoping it's right since it seems like the more reasonable choice.
Answer:
Im Pretty sure The geography and resources available were different
Explanation:
