The Medicine Creek treaty.
The "Boldt Decision" (named after the judge who made the ruling) was officially the decision in United States v. Washington, a case heard <span>in the </span>United States District Court for the Western District of Washington<span> and the </span>United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1974.
The Treaty of Medicine Creek (1854) was one of several treaties in view, including the Treaty of Olympia (1855), Treaty of Point Elliott (1855), and the Point No Point Treaty (1855). Isaac Stevens was the governor of the Washington Territory, who had been involved in signing such treaties.
The Boldt Decision affirmed the fishing rights of Native American tribes in waters not located on their reservation lands, but where they had traditionally fished and held that the tribes were entitled to half the fish harvest from those waters each year.
Answer:
Explanation:
Automobiles used by a delivery company would be a capital good, but for a family, they would be a consumer good.
Ovens used by a restaurant would be a capital good but can also be a consumer good.
Computers can be used by companies but also by consumers.
Landscaping equipment can be used
Buildings (including subsequent costs that extend the useful life of a building)
Computer equipment
Office equipment
Furniture and fixtures (including the cost of furniture that is aggregated and treated as a single unit, such as a group of desks)
Intangible assets (such as a purchased taxi license or a patent) by landscaping companies and by
Corruption of an electoral process could most likely arise from the desire of "foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils." To minimize risk of foreign machinations and inducements, the electoral college members would have only a "transient existence" and no elector could be a "senator, representative ...
<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
