The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
It would be important because majority of political power and money was there
En gros, c'est comme ça que vous montrez d'où il vient: Adolf hitler kim ll sung mao zendong c'est comme si l'état ne reconnaissait aucune limite à son autorité et s'efforçait de réglementer chaque aspect de la vie publique et privée chaque fois que possible.
Answer:
A would make the most sense
Explanation:
