1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
3 years ago
11

n state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a jury is unable to make a decision. a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision

. a precedent does not exist. a higher court agrees to hear it.
Social Studies
2 answers:
ki77a [65]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

if the higher court agrees to hear it

Explanation:

Ann [662]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:In state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a higher court agrees to hear it.

Explanation:

A state courts is a court that typically triewy cases that are between the citizens of a state. It is the federal courts that try disputes between the states.

It should be noted that for a state court,

the losing party can appeal a case in a situation whereby there is a higher court that agrees to hear it. Such case will then be transferred to the higher court so that it will be resolved.

You might be interested in
Which of the following landmarks can be found in Keystone, South Dakota?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

Mt Rushmore

Explanation:

Cause I went there a while back before the pandemic started hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Russell and his family are thinking about getting a new big-screen television. He has researched different brands, models, and p
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

purchaser

Explanation:

In business, purchaser are the people or organizations that make economic sacrifice in order to obtain a specific goods and serviced.

From the example above,

In order to obtain the new big-screen television, Russell will most likely need to spend the money that he earned from his work and exchange that money to for the TV.  This is what considered as economic sacrifice.

3 0
3 years ago
The Boston Massacre was most significant:
aniked [119]

Answer:

option C

Explanation:

The correct answer is option C

Boston massacre was most significant because it turned colonial sentiment of the Americans against King George III and British Parliamentary authority.

Samuel Adams and many other patriots encouraged people by using the example of the incident of the Boston massacre to stand united against Britishers.

This massacre united Americans to fight for freedom from the Britishers.

3 0
3 years ago
What contribution did emma Balfour make during the civil war
sasho [114]

Answer:

Her diary gave us information about Siege of Vicksburg.

Explanation:

<u>Emma Balfour is considered to be a celebrated diarist of the Siege of Vicksburg. </u>

In a famous event, she refused to leave and even gave shelter to the soldiers.

She kept a daily diary during her life, recording all the happenings, emotions, sufferings and life during the siege of her city. She wrote about military actions, but also about the everyday lives of the people who tried to survive, about supplies that were lacking, and about fears that they will experience the worst.

Emma survived the siege and her diary today tells us the first-hand testimony of the experience of the Siege of Vicksburg.

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose there is a policy debate over imposing trade restrictions on imported semiconductors in the United States. A political p
jolli1 [7]

Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.

Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.

This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.

The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to this passage, what was Roosevelt’s real reason for breaking up Standard Oil? He believed that Standard Oil was unli
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following terms is defined as "a sense of historical, cultural, and sometimes ancestral connection to a group of pe
    12·1 answer
  • The map shows the Fertile Crescent.
    12·2 answers
  • A series of Union victories in late 1864 helped Abraham Lincoln win reelection.
    7·2 answers
  • A young woman approaches the counter wanting to buy a bottle of wine. you cannot tell by her physical appearance if she is a min
    7·2 answers
  • Realism ______. Question 31 options: 1) is the systematic study of political behavior institutionalized at the turn of the 20th
    6·1 answer
  • All of the following are characteristics of SMART goals except
    15·1 answer
  • The fact that both parties contribute to the meaning created during interpersonal communication suggests that interpersonal comm
    14·1 answer
  • Cultural lag was a term coined by William Ogburn to refer to a situation in which some parts of a culture adapt to an invention
    8·1 answer
  • QUESTION 1 / 10
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!