Answer:
More likely to take over democracy
Explanation:
Looking at the modern political world, it seems much less far-fetched to me now. In democratic nations like Turkey, the U.K., Hungary, Brazil and the U.S., anti-elite demagogues are riding a wave of populism fueled by nationalist pride. It is a sign that liberal constraints on democracy are weakening.
To philosophers, the term “liberalism” means something different than it does in partisan U.S. politics. Liberalism as a philosophy prioritizes the protection of individual rights, including freedom of thought, religion and lifestyle, against mass opinion and abuses of government power.
In a capitalist society, a person pays for what they utilize and pays no taxes.
In a socialist society, a person collectively pays for everything publicly funded through taxes.
These are only the definitions of "pure" capitalism and socialism. Currently, no society has such; they have a mix of the two.
Answer:
Explanation:
racial inequality is not necessarily the same thing as racism, though the two do often go hand in hand. Perhaps it would be fair to say that racism is defined by a prejudice towards a group of people based on their race or ethnicity, and racial inequality is the result of that prejudice. For example, while it would be hard to point towards the racism of any one individual to account for the disparity between wealth in white families, and wealth in black families, it is nevertheless certainly an example of racial inequality. The fact that average black people have less money than white people is very plainly a result of lack of opportunity.
After all, we know quite plainly that while western culture (particularly the United States) values the “pull yourself up by the bootstraps narrative”, it is ultimately usually generational wealth that wins the day.
The racial inequality, in this case, is a result of the fact that African Americans started as slaves in this country, and then suffered through Jim Crowe laws, and other circumstance that contributed to a difficulty in establishing a foothold in prosperous circumstance.
It is important to note that situations of racial inequality do not necessarily pertain to every member of a given race. For example, not all African Americans struggle economically, and not all Caucasians prosper financially. In fact, there are countless examples of each case where the exact opposite is true. When people refer to racial inequality, they are talking about patterns that all too often manifest themselves in our society.
Attribution Theory focuses on how individuals explain their success and failure.
Option A
<u>Explanation</u>:
Attribution theory revolves around how individuals express events and how this affects their thinking and behaviour, so basically how they express their success and failure. This theory was proposed by Wiener and colleagues. The theory researches on why people do what they tend to do and other cases on their behaviour. So we can say that attribution theory revolves around the behavioural patterns of individuals in terms of achievement and failure.
A person who seeks to understand why a person did something is one of the causes to that behaviour which has three cases. One being, the person must have a keen eye on the behaviour, the second being that the person must know that the behaviour was performed intentionally, and the third one being that the person must know or believe that the other person was forced to perform the behaviour or not.
