The above question requires a personal answer, where you must express your opinion about Thoreau's text. For that reason, I cannot answer this question for you, but I will show you how to answer it.
To answer this question, you will:
- Read Thoreau's text to which your question refers.
- You should reread the entire paragraph 23 of the text and analyze the arguments Thoreau presented in this paragraph about the effects of wealth on the character of individuals.
After this reading, you should reflect on what Thoreau showed and decide whether or not you agree with these arguments.
After this decision, you will be able to answer your question as follows:
- Present Thoreau's main argument.
- Show whether or not you agree with his argument.
- Show the reasons why you reach this conclusion.
More information:
brainly.com/question/14358352?referrer=searchResults
I believe the correct answer is implicit association
test (iat).
The implicit association test (IAT) is the most
widely used test in <span>social psychology to
measure implicit attitudes and preferences is the. IAT is developed and
introduced in scientific literature by psychologist Anthony Greenwald, Debbie
McGhee, and Jordan Schwartz in 1998.</span>
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
Jill will not be able to recover consequential damages. A consequential damage can be recovered if the consequence is foreseeable. However, Jill seems to have relied on this only carrier in order to open his Ice cream shop. Since he will not be able to open the shop due to a failure to deliver the machine- part, the consequential damage cannot be repaid because this circumstance was unforeseeable.
Answer:
airport security stricter