A historian could best use this map to study which topic?

History

1 answer:

IrinaVladis [17]2 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is number 2) Cold War confrontations.

Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the map. Where is the map?

Without the map, just you know the information. We don't.

However, trying to help you we did some deep research and found one map that highlights places where the United States and the Soviet Union had conflicts and confrontations during the Cold War years.

The places highlighted on the map are the Island of Cuba, North and South Korea, and North and South Vietnam.

So the correct answer indeed is:

A historian could best use this map to study the topic "Cold War confrontations."

During the tense years of the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the United States competed in the arms race, the space race, and the spread/containment of Communism in different places of the world such as the Island of Cuba Korea Vietnam.

You might be interested in

What was the greatest danger that the escaped slaves faced?

Blababa [14]

The danger and difficulty in escaping from slavery are hard to imagine. Most slaves were illiterate and had no money and few, if any, possessions. The colour of their skin made them easy targets during the daylight for those who would hunt them down—often with the help of bloodhounds—and return them to their owners.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did the article of confederation make the issue of currency product so difficult

ryzh [129]

It was because different states had their own dollars, and some places did not accept dollars from every state

5 0

3 years ago

It cut off the states of arkansas, louisiana, and texas from the rest of the confederacy. it gave the union navy complete contro

Sav [38]

The siege of Vicksburg<span />

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which Amendment Process allows for the ability to get a petition signed by 8% of the voters

marysya [2.9K]

The answer is A. US.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?

Vlada [557]

This is a matter of opinion. Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives? Well, firstly, it ended World War II. That's kind of a big deal. In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender. Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked! Secondly, it was a triumph of science. The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science. Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science. The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb. </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power. Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!

But there's a lot of negatives here, too. Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone. Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost. The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars! A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan. When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating. People were vaporized. Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage. People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation. It was awful! Thirdly, it caused the arms race. Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own. Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think? Was it worth it?

6 0

3 years ago