Answer:
The systematic portion of the unexpected return is 1.180% and the unsystematic portion was 0.288%
Explanation:
E(R) = 0.034 + 1.18*(0.108 - 0.034) = 0.12132
R - E(R) = 0.136 - 0.12132 = 0.01468
RM - E(RM) = 0.118 - 0.108 = 0.01
[RM - E(RM)] * Beta = 0.01 * 1.18 = 0.0118 = 1.180%
[R - E(R)] - [RM - E(RM)] * Beta = 0.01468 * 0.0118 = 0.00288 = 0.288%
Answer:
62
Explanation:
I first divided 3 into 180 which is 60 because 18 divided by 3 is 6 and then you add back on that 0 getting to 60. Then for the 6, divide that by 3, which is 2 which you add to the 60 getting to 62.
I hope this helps and please don't hesitate to ask if there is anything still unclear!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statement, if true, that would explain the analysts' predictions would be "the Producer Price Index has been steadily increasing over the past few months."
That is what would have been the factor that supports the forecast. Although inflation has been constant at low levels, what changed was the Producer Price Index that is moving up. This factor could modify the results despite inflation is stable at this moment. When inflation is high, it directly affects the price of goods and the consumer.
