Answer:
Andrew did do a proper feasibility study about the land
Explanation: Andrew lots chunk of money because he gave out his land half of the price he bought it initially. And bought another at a higher price
which is more than the 10,000 dollars
Answer:
Market value at 8% YTM $ 743.2156
at 10% YTM $ 619.6960
Explanation:
Assuming the face value is 1,000 as common outstanding American company's bonds:
Market value under the current scenario:
<u>Present value of the coupon payment:</u>
<u />
Coupon: $1,000 x 5% = 50
time 15 years
rate 0.08
PV $427.9739
<u>Present Value of the Maturity</u>
<u />
Maturity 1,000.00
time 15.00
rate 0.08
PV 315.24
PV c $427.9739
PV m $315.2417
Total $743.2156
If the interest rate in the market increaseby 2% then investor will only trade the bonds to get a yield 2% higher that is 10% so we recalculate the new price:
C 50.000
time 15
rate 0.1
PV $380.3040
Maturity 1,000.00
time 15.00
rate 0.1
PV 239.39
PV c $380.3040
PV m $239.3920
Total $619.6960
Giving a lower price than before
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The given data is as follows:
Error rate = 4%, per hour payment of inspector = $8, inspection of units = at the rate of 49 per hour, cost = $9 per unit
The problem can be solved as considering an opportunity to have an improvement of 4% in the quality.
In case inspector is not hired then it will cost .04 multiply 9= $.3.6 per unit and in case the inspector is hired it will cost $ 0.163 approx.(8 divided by 49).
Therefore, on comparison, it is recommended to hire the inspector.
Answer:
Left
Explanation:
Complement goods are goods that are used together. If the price of one good goes up, consumers would demand less of the other good.
If the price of club membership increases, the demand for club membership would fall. Since membership has fallen ,there won't be need to purchase golf clubs as they are complements, so the demand for golf clubs would fall and the demand curve for golf clubs would shift to the left.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Explanation:
X - number of units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600X
Total cost for purchasing = 2000X
a. For 4000 units sold
Total cost for production = 1,500,000 + 1600 * 4000 = $7,900,000
Total cost for purchasing = 2000* 4000 = $8,000,000
In this case producing is cheaper. Therefore, it is better to produce
b. Y - break-even point
Then : 1,500,000 + 1600 * Y = 2000* Y
So 1,500,000 = 400 Y
Y = 3750
At №of units less than 3750 purchasing will be the better option
And above 3750 producing will be the better option
