Answer:
The answer is: British policies limit colonial rights.
A cause that led to the demand of political change by the colonies is that the British policies that limited colonial rights.
As a consequence of the debt left by the French and India War (1754-1763), the British charged the colonies very high taxes, which caused great dislike to the American colonies:
In 1765, the Stamp Act was approved. This policy was a direct taxation on colonies for the use of commercial and legal papers, which needed to have a "stamp" on it according to the British Parliament. In 1764, the Sugar Act, another form of revenue-raising, was passed. From the outset, this regulation aimed at raising revenue from the taxes on the trade of molasses and rum.
Moreover, the American colonies felt angry at the fact that they didn't have any voice to speak for them in the British Parliament. And afterwards, colonies demand political change.
(Brainly)
Explanation:
Answer:
One similarity of between WW1 and WW2 is that during both wars, the United States try to stay neutral. Another similarity is how technology advances occur in both wars. For example, the submarines by the German during WW1 and the atomic bomb that America created in WW2.
One differences between WW1 and WW2 is how during WW1 was caused by the MANIA, which stands for Militarism, Alliances, Nationalism, Imperialism, and of Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his spouse Sophie. Another difference of WW1 and WW2 is how WW2 was more deadlier because of the technological advances. But also because of many tragic events such as the Holocausts.
Explanation:
Answer:
Although the word “history” sometimes refers to what has taken place, it more commonly refers to the story or account of what has taken place. No human account of what has taken place can ever be exhaustive: we simply do not and cannot know enough. For example, a history of the Roman Empire cannot possibly tell us everything that took place within the Roman Empire during the centuries the empire existed. Any history of the Roman Empire will necessarily be selective. A history will be judged as excellent or poor on the basis of how representative it is, how the parts are made to cohere, how evidence has been handled, and the like. However the history is organized, it involves sequence (keeping an eye on time), cause and effect, trends, and evaluation of significance.
Salvation history is thus the history of salvation — i .e., the history of events that focus on the salvation of human beings and issues involving the new heaven and the new earth. Even when the focus narrows to one man, Abraham, and his descendants, that man is given the promise that in him and in his seed all the nations of the earth will be blessed (Gen 12:3). Biblical Christianity is not an abstract or timeless philosophy (though of course it involves abstractions): at least in part, it is the account of what God has done, of the events and explanations he has brought about in order to save lost human beings. (Even what “salvation” means, what it means to be “saved,” is disclosed in this history.) From this, four things follow:
