1.216m because 1ft is 12in
Comparing and contrasting European colonization on East Africa and Central and South Africa shows:
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was not as much as other parts of Africa.
South Africa:
- Slavery was rampant.
- Impoverishment of South and Central Africans and wealth to Europeans.
<h3>How was colonization in Southern Africa different from Eastern Africa?</h3>
The colonization in Southern Africa was overall negative as Africans were taken as slaves and treated as inferior to Europeans who took most of the wealth. This was especially the case in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa.
The East Africans were however not subjugated to much slavery and the trade in textiles and metal brought some prosperity.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/1395188
#SPJ1
Answer:
Selfish and self-serving
Explanation:
Hobbes' natural philosophy that human beings are, at their core, selfish creatures.
State and local governments also increased taxes during the 1930s, with many imposing individual income taxes for the first time. All these tax increases killed incentives for work, investment, and entrepreneurship at a time when they were sorely needed.
Explanation:
As you can see, taxes were also increased or stayed the same which didn’t really help the people. Because of this, they demanded new forms of government.
Answer: Help keep the public informed about issues
