Answer:
Donna and Carl
Explanation:
Owners of the property are Donna and Carl, because Carl has not passed or sold his property to anyone, so Carl has documentation in his name stating that he is the property owner. Similarly, Aaron also had documentation stating that he owned the property, but Aaron sold his property to Donna, so another document was issued stating that Donna is the new owner of the property that was owned by Aaron.
However, Bob, who also had a document stating that he owned the property, died. Bob, before dying, has made it clear that he wants his property to be passed on to Frank after his death, but all documentation left by Bob needs to be reviewed to prove that Frank can inherit his property if proven, new documentation should be made stating that Frank is the owner. Until then only Carl and Donna can claim to be the property owners.
Answer:
You stop at an intersection just like you do with a normal red light.
Explanation:
You should do what the officer says. And go where the officer directs you.
Answer:
Because those outcomes are rare.
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
The First Amendment includes the right of free religion.
Answer:
Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.
AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.