1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
3 years ago
7

The burden of proof in a civil case is:

Law
2 answers:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is D
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The burden of proof in a civil case is a preponderance (51%). In a criminal case the burden is the highest, beyond a reasonable doubt.

You might be interested in
Hello, I kinda need help on this. This is my last thing to do for the day. So pls help and ty, have a wonderful day.
zzz [600]

Answer:

1.) Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size.

Congress did not have the power to tax.

Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce.

2.) if each state only has one vote regardless of size that means that California and maine would have the same amount of votes regardless of the population diffrence.

as of now are country relays on tax to do things like pave roads and funding for schools.

that basically means that they didnt have the power to regulate things like the railroads.

3.) I mean to be honest the reason the constitution was written was more then just the three failings it was a combination of all of the things that had gone wrong in the few years of the confederation.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do u fo witch freak jjjjkr gggtr. Yu ifidbrig f f f. He h. R eh s h d how much fun time is there to be able for the kids and
professor190 [17]

Answer:

huh im confused

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
After a famous organized crime boss is convicted of racketeering, their attorney vows that the District Court made a mistake. As
Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

Surpreme Court of the United States

Explanation:

If it is suspected that the District Attourny made a mistake, the next highest step in the Surpreme Court of the United States.

3 0
2 years ago
15 points to whoever answers this :D
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

Revised the three strikes law to impose life sentence only when the new felony conviction is "serious or violent."

Explanation:

Proposition 36 modified elements of California's "Three Strikes" Law, which was approved by the state's voters in 1994. In 2004, voters rejected Proposition 66, which like the 2012 measure was an attempt to change some aspects of the original "Three Strikes" Law.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is Double Jeopardy important to Americans?
    9·1 answer
  • Which pavement marking would allow for passing only on one side?
    12·2 answers
  • Which Article in the Constitution establishes the Legislative Branch?
    7·1 answer
  • Help please text timed ASAP !!
    7·2 answers
  • The purpose of the Department of Homeland Security is to coordinate and share information
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following correctly identifies methods of funding available to a claimant bringing an action in negligence?
    12·2 answers
  • What is the main benefit of the use of technology in private security?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do ppl hate me when i feel like im nothing in life im just asking a mf question
    11·1 answer
  • What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why Article I of the Constitution prevents a president of the United States from enacting a federal budget on his or her
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!