Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
Answer:
Rule of president
Explanation:
Because of the power and everything
Answer:
The media, despite its biases, are best able to monitor the government when they are free.
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Historically speaking in the 1970s the United States there began much discussion about an anticipated increase in the number of juveniles (someone below the age of 18) that would commit convictable crimes.
Thus, some individuals began campaigns in the 1970s that spawned fears of juveniles who commit horrific crimes.
Answer:
You could get arrested or you could get in a trouble because you are not respecting other peoples personal space
