1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
3 years ago
10

How did writing play a role in everyday life for the ancient Indians? help please I will do anything!!

History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
4 0
Its use is not known with certainty and all that we think we know is based on archaeological evidence alone. Some of the seals may have been used as amulets or talismans, but they also had a practical function as a marker for identification. Since writing in ancient times is generally associated with elites trying to record and control transactions, it is also believed that the Indus Script was used as an administrative tool. There are also examples of this script being used on clay tags attached to bundles of goods that were traded between merchants; some of these clay tags have been found in the Mesopotamia region, well outside the Indus Valley, a testimony of how wide goods travelled in ancient times.
You might be interested in
What does ancestor mean?
NISA [10]
A person, typically one more remote than a grandparent, from whom one is descended:
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two main compromises of the constitutional convention and how did it effect the government?
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

  • The Great Compromise (also known as the Connecticut Compromise)
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise

The two compromises affected the way a state's representation in Congress would be determined.

Explanation:

Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  

The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

7 0
3 years ago
How did walter anderson impact others?
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

Walter Inglis Anderson (September 29, 1903 – November 30, 1965) was an American painter and writer.

7 0
2 years ago
Among the forms of Consequentialism, which one do you most believe in? Why?
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.

Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.

This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.

4 0
2 years ago
What solved the increasing labor problem the Spanish had in the america
vlabodo [156]
They had a war and lots died but america won
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which occurs during market equilibrium? Check all that apply. Supply and demand meet at a specific price. Supply is slightly gre
    7·2 answers
  • Which battle contributed to General Grant and Union troops taking control of the entire Mississippi River?
    13·2 answers
  • Mussolini was able to take over Italy because Italy’s ______________ was unwilling to risk a battle with protestors in Rome.
    14·2 answers
  • Which is an accurate description of the oracle of Delphi
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the event where king delivered his speech
    15·1 answer
  • What caused the b-52 crash
    12·1 answer
  • Place the events of world war II in the correct order<br> postdam declaration
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think that the slave traders<br> removed their clothes, belongings and<br> hair?
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think Europeans would have gone to The New World without Zheng He's<br> exploration? Why?
    12·2 answers
  • The number of research papers in Dr. Carey's area of expertise has been increasing by 3% every year. Given that 34,176 research
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!