1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
worty [1.4K]
3 years ago
6

Alexander hamilton stood for a flexible reading of the constitution, but thomas jefferson stood for

History
1 answer:
WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
7 0
Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson thought that what powers were not specifically stated in the Constitution belonged to the states and the people. Ultimately, it was the job of the people to keep the federal government in check.
You might be interested in
How large a majority is required in both houses of congress to pass an amendment?
dmitriy555 [2]
2/3 of the vote must be in favor or against to pass
7 0
3 years ago
Patronage of most medieval musicians was supplied by the A) wealthy B) church C) monarchs D) towns
Serhud [2]
A) wealthy-<span>"The </span>most<span> powerful periods of the Byzantium Empire were years that were ... Feared as warriors, respected for their piety and sought out for their </span>wealth, ..... been called the Co-Patron<span> of Europe, along with Sts. Cyril and Methodius.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What tense is the underlined verb in the sentence? The architect designed a daring structure. A. present B. past perfect C. pres
diamong [38]

The conjugation of the verb "design" to "designed", without any auxiliary verb such as "have" or "do", shows the use of the 'simple past" tense (also known as preterite), whose principal function is to place a completed action or situation in a moment before "now".

What tense is the underlined verb in the sentence? The architect designed a daring structure.

D. Past


4 0
3 years ago
What is one power the supreme court has over the judicial court
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

The President (Executive Branch) has the power to appoint US Supreme Court justices and other (Article III ) federal judges. subject to approval by the Senate. He can and does choose judges who subscribe to his own legal philosophy and so can possibly shape future court opinions. The judges serve for life and their stance on future cases is hard to predict in many cases.

The president can also grant pardons for federal offenses

One is the fact that the judicial branch needs the executive branch to enforce its decisions. As an example, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka, it took the President's ordering the National Guard out to make some states abide by the ruling. The Judicial Branch has no way to enforce its decisions without the executive's co-operation.. Another is the fact that it is the executive branch that nominates the judges in the first place. As a practical matter, presidents nominate persons who share the same political beliefs they do. This has the effect of creating (or trying to create) a judicial branch that will interpret the Constitution the way that that president would like. Trouble is, once a Supreme Court Justice is confirmed, nothing can be done to force him or her to rule in a particular way. They are appointed with lifetime tenure on good behavior and their salaries cannot be diminished while they are in office.. And as to salaries, nothing says a president has to include raises for them in any budget he proposes.

The Executive branch gets to choose candidates for federal judgeships, including Supreme Court Justices. The President also has the power to pardon people convicted of federal offenses, Since the President controls the Department of Justice, he has some leeway in how laws are enforced.

8 0
4 years ago
If you were a US civilian living during World War II, which government action would have influenced your everyday life most?
trasher [3.6K]
If i were a US civilian living during World War II, the rationing of materials to support the war effort would be the government action that would have influenced my everyday life the most. The correct option in regards to the given question is option "D". Rationing of materials would definitely create a shortage of regularly needed materials in the market. This would be a hard thing to accept. Since we all live our daily life in a fixed pattern, it is difficult to adjust to any kind of curtails. This shortage can always lead to a higher rate for buying those restricted materials and thus my income could seem less than before as the cost of buying gets increased.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After the british shut down the massachusetts legislature it met in secret under the direction of
    5·1 answer
  • The townshend acts allowed search warrants also called ______.
    12·1 answer
  • What effects did the arrival of Europeans have on Native Americans? (1 point)
    11·2 answers
  • Define Clergy from the medieval times
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    5·1 answer
  • What roman god was belived to control nature
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Yalta conference lead to tensions between the United States and the Soviet union
    7·1 answer
  • Three types of sequences are arithmetic,_________, and an ordered list of numbers.
    13·1 answer
  • 14) who ever gets this will get a brainlest and a good rating
    6·2 answers
  • Why did India setup a social structure? Short summary
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!