Answer:
pls amke it more clear pls just pls
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 50%
Step-by-step explanation:
In 2010, there were only 2 bike manufacturers and they had market shares of 30% and 70%.
A new manufacturer joins the market and captures 10% of the market share and Splendor increases to 40% of market share.
Market shares:
Yamaha = 10%
Splendor = 40%
Passion = 100% - 10% - 40%
= 50%
The solution to the given expression negative four and one third ÷ two and one fifth is -1 32/33
<h3>Fraction division</h3>
negative four and one third ÷ two and one fifth
-4 1/3 ÷ 2 1/5
= -13/3 ÷ 11/5
- Multiply by the reciprocal of 11/5
- The reciprocal of 11/5 is 5/11
= -13/3 × 5/11
= (-13 × 5) / (3 × 11)
= -65 / 33
= -1 32/33
Therefore, the solution to the fraction is -1 32/33
Learn more about fraction:
brainly.com/question/11562149
#SPJ1
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
simplified it would be - 
</h2><h2>Hope this helps!!</h2>
