1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
2 years ago
15

Plz help HW plz help HW plz help HW

Mathematics
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  • 55°, 70°, 55°

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Δ MHP is right triangle, therefore</u>

  • m∠P = 90° - 35° = 55°

<u>ΔMNP  is isosceles triangle as MN = MP, therefore</u>

  • m∠N = m∠P = 55°
  • m∠NMP = 180° - 2*55° = 70°

You might be interested in
PLS HELP (links = report)
NARA [144]

Answer:

2040 m3

Step-by-step explanation:

you see in the pic, the shape may cut into 2 pieces, this is 1/2 of the shape.

so we take (24*10*17)/2=2040 m3.

Hope it helps you

3 0
3 years ago
Researchers wanted to determine if there was an association between the level of satisfaction of an individual and their risk of
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

To see if there is an association between the variables:

"Level of satisfaction of an individual"

"Risk of diabetes of an individual"

The researchers studied 1621 people over 5 years.

Observations recorded:

Interviews of daily lives and hassles and hypothetical situations that were studied to assess their emotions.

Determination, if in the course of these 5 years the individuals experienced any type of diabetes.

Conclusion "Satisfied individuals are less likely to have diabetes"

a) This is a prospective cohort study.

In this type of study, a group of individuals that share the same characteristics is observed over some time, recording the events of interest.

b) Considering that the experiment concluded that "satisfaction" reduces the "risk of diabetes", we can determine that the response variable is "Risk of diabetes of an individual" and the explanatory variable is "Level of satisfaction of an individual".

Remember, the explanatory variable is the one considered to have a direct effect over the response variable.

c) "the research team also hasn't ruled out that a common factor like genetics could be causing both the emotions and the lung cancer."

There is a new variable that may affect the experiment. Be "genetic factor" the new variable and it affects directly "emotions and lung cancer", we can say that if some of those individuals are genetically predisposed to have lung cancer, this affects their emotions (satisfaction) and therefore, modifying their risk of having diabetes.

If this is so, then the genetic factor could be a lurking variable affecting directly the result of the observational experiment. Then the correct answer is:

A. The researchers may be concerned with confounding that occurs when the effects of two or more explanatory variables are not separated or when some explanatory variables were not considered in a study, but that affects the value of the response variable.

I hope it helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Initially, there were only 86 weeds in the garden. The weeds grew at a rate of 29% each week. The following function represents
Orlov [11]

Step-by-step answer:

The base of the exponential function is 1.29 for 7 days, as in

f(x) = 86*(1.29)^x

The new rate for days can be calculated by dividing x by 7 (where x remains the number of weeks), namely

f(x) = 86*1.29^(x/7)

Using the law of exponents, b^(x/a) = b^(x*(1/a)) = (b^(1/a))^x

we simplify by putting b=1.29, a=7 to get

f(x) = 86*(1.29^(1/7))^x

f(x) = 86*(1.037)^x      since 1.29^(1/7) evaluates to 1.037

Rounding 1.037 to 1.04 we get a (VERY) approximate function

f(x) = 86 * (1.04^x)

1.04 is very approximate because 1.04^7 is supposed to get back 1.29, but it is actually 1.316, while 1.037^7 gives 1.2896, much closer to 1.29.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 4 times 4 and 5555 times 8999989
Ket [755]

Answer:

4 *4 = 16

16 * 5555 = 88880

88880 * 8999989 = 799919022320

Brainliest :D

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4(2x+7) +3 (2x+7) but (2x+7) is equal to 2
vodomira [7]
Use the distributive property to get 8x+28+6x+21 then combine 8x and 6x and also combine 28 and 21 to get 14x+49, do u need to go further or?
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is there a 0 the quotient
    7·1 answer
  • Simplify 2+3/5X subtract one subtract 1/5X
    9·1 answer
  • What is the surface area of the rectangular pyramid below
    13·2 answers
  • A local convenience store in a large city closes each day at 10 P.M. The owner of the store is investigating whether mean sales
    15·1 answer
  • A certain television is advertised as a 58-inch TV (the diagonal length). If the width of the TV is 42 inches, how many inches t
    7·1 answer
  • Identify an equation in slope-intercept from for the line parallel to y=-3x + 7 that passes through (2, -4)
    14·1 answer
  • What is the mean of the data 9,3,4,4,4,3,2,2,20,20 answer to the nearest tenth​
    15·2 answers
  • Solve the equation below
    8·2 answers
  • Trigonometry question<br> worth 100 points! <br> desperately need help
    7·1 answer
  • A textbook store sold a combined total of 204 math and psychology textbooks in a week. The number of math textbooks sold was thr
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!