Government interference in business
<span>I can't say I know much about the history of Buddhism, but I think I know something about the practice itself. Christianity is a religion of action - a religion that speaks out and acts out. It's a religion that goes to war and asserts itself to gain followers and prove points. From what I understand about Buddhism, it is a 'passive' religion. It is a system of belief that stands on meditation and response rather than reaction. I haven't really heard of any Buddhist groups starting wars, fighting in battles, and singing in victory. Their triumph comes in quiet ways whereas it seems that Christianity triumphed in loud and obvious ways.</span>
Answer:
This is a difficult question to explain, and here is my opinion, they shouldn't.
Explanation:
Not allowing mobs to influence government actions, depends on how you define mobs. If they are peaceful protests, then they should be allowed to influence government action, for example, the civil rights movement.
A violent mob would be seen as a rebellion, at a certain extent, and shouldn't be allowed to influence government policies and decisions.
