Never underestimate the power of the stupid man speaking the crowds.
No matter how many people or individuals are smart, they follow the law of the crowd in the crowd. The law of the crowd nullifies everything, meaning, sense, purpose, leads to the abyss. What is patriotism if it excludes the power of judgment if it overwhelms our mind with something that we are not?
Whether it is fascism, democracy or communism, the fascinated leaders who are pushing us towards each other, because of some higher goal, are a complex lunatic. It has been scientifically proven that all the leaders of this type, in essence, had some bizarre reasons that go into the collective and personally unconscious, as such manipulated by interest groups, and gained great power to manipulate the masses. Every time we hear such a speech where we begin to feel hypnotized, it is not good, it needs to shake it from itself and from the head.
The best way to defend from growing fascism is to preserve individuality, self-awareness, human values, and at no cost accept any of these ideas of false patriotism and various other explanations that we are not able to understand something. Whenever we hear such a thing, we should put beyond this our universal meaning of life that we received at our birth. That sense will tell us what is true and what lies.
Answer:
Forests and Atlantic Coast
Explanation:
The Forests serves as a source of lumber or timber in the production of shipbuilding, while the Atlantic coast serves as both the port and navigation route where the trading activities are based between the colonies and Europe.
Hence, the presence of FOREST and WATER ( Atlantic Coast) is the common geographical feature that helped in the immediate and timely development of North Carolina, New Jersey, Virginia, New York, and Massachusetts colonies.
All these aforementioned places are part of New England.
Answer:False
Explanation:I just took the test.
Answer:
International relations, the study of the relations of states with each other and with international organizations and certain subnational entities (e.g., bureaucracies, political parties, and interest groups). It is related to a number of other academic disciplines, including political science, geography, history, economics, law, sociology, psychology, and philosophy.
The field of international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Whereas the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. The traditional view that foreign and military matters should remain the exclusive preserve of rulers and other elites yielded to the belief that such matters constituted an important concern and responsibility of all citizens. This increasing popularization of international relations reinforced the idea that general education should include instruction in foreign affairs and that knowledge should be advanced in the interests of greater public control and oversight of foreign and military policy.
This new perspective was articulated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (1913–21) in his program for relations between the Great Powers following a settlement of World War I. The first of his Fourteen Points, as his program came to be known, was a call for “open covenants of peace, openly arrived at” in place of the secret treaties that were believed to have contributed to the outbreak of the war. The extreme devastation caused by the war strengthened the conviction among political leaders that not enough was known about international relations and that universities should promote research and teaching on issues related to international cooperation and war and peace.
International relations scholarship prior to World War I was conducted primarily in two loosely organized branches of learning: diplomatic history and international law. Involving meticulous archival and other primary-source research, diplomatic history emphasized the uniqueness of international events and the methods of diplomacy as it was actually conducted. International law—especially the law of war—had a long history in international relations and was viewed as the source of fundamental normative standards of international conduct. The emergence of international relations was to broaden the scope of international law beyond this traditional focal point.
