Answer:
Explanation:
B C and D have become tools that have been tried.
Deficit spending is a budget/government policy. Its use should be very limited.
Same with Increased Government Spending. FDR was the master at controlled government spending.
Reducing income taxes is another government policy.
So only A is an example of monetary policy. This is a regulation imposed on the Banks by the Federal Reserve.
Answer:
$906.30
Explanation:
Face value (FV) = $1000
Coupon payment (C) = 7% of $1000 = $70
Yield to maturity (r) = 8% = 0.08
t = 18
Number of compounding periods (n) = 1 (annually)
Using the relation:
C[( 1 - (1 + r/n)^-nt) / (r/n)] + FV / (1 + r/n)^nt
70[(1 - (1 + 0.08)^-1*18) / (0.08/1)] + 1000 / (1 + 0.08/1)^1*18
70[1 - (1.08)^-18) / 0.08] + 1000 / 1.08^18
70[(1 - 0.2502490)/0.08] + (1000 / 3.99601949918)
70(9.3718871) + 250.24902
= $906.281117
= $906.30
Answer: Relational
Explanation: Relational orientation is a term in marketing where a marketer or producer identify the need of its customers or consumers and make available products that will meet their need and help to build a good relationship with the consumers or customer. This term is used by most multinationals like Apple etc to build brand loyalty and maintain a good market share.
Answer:
The board most likely will not be held responsible.
Explanation:
The board of directors can legally defend themselves based on the Business Judgement Rule. This rule in contained in the <u>Corporations Act of 2001 - Section 180.</u> It states that any decision made in regards to the business operations should be:
- In good faith and not based on personal gain
- In the best interest of the corporation
- Based on information that supports the decision
For this particular case, the board based their decision on <em>previous market research</em> that received positive feedback.
Answer:
Explanation:
This could be due a number of factors.
1 Externality effect
2 There could also be market failure, when property rights are not properly defined.
Externality is the effect of a third party on a property right, when all parties cannot come to an agreeable resolution on properties this could lead to inefficient use of land.
Also when the property rights are not put in place its difficult to come to a resolution that satisfies all parties.