Answer:
1. There are many potential reasons, including: competition over territory and resources, historical rivalries and grievances, and in self defense against an aggressor or a perceived potential aggressor. War arises because of the changing relations of numerous variables--technological, psychic, social, and intellectual. There is no single cause of war. Peace is an equilibrium among many forces.
2. Talk directly. Assuming that there is no threat of physical violence, talk directly to the person with whom you have the problem. ...
Choose a good time. ...
Plan ahead. ...
Don't blame or name-call. ...
Give information. ...
Listen. ...
Show that you are listening. ...
3. Usually people think that conflict cannot be solved by war, it should be solved with negotiations. ... These are things that cannot be determined by cooperation and negotiation talks. People must be hurt in order to solve issues; the end justifies the means. Hence war is a suitable mechanism to end conflict!
Explanation:
Natural resource would be the answer
The correct answer is option C "The Fed buys and sells treasury bonds in the bond market". A major tool available to Federal Reserve is the open market operations (OMO), which operates by buying or selling Treasury bonds in the open market. By doing this, the Fed can directly manipulate interests rate and affects the money supply to bring balance to the market.
<span>Industrial revolution affected the north a great deal and was all pretty much positive except for the problems that came when immigrants started coming in but the immigrants made the population in the north skyrocket. The economy was doing well, the transportation system was going good. The only problems were the labor unions that formed when the workers decided they wanted more pay and better working conditions and the wealthy wanted to increase profits in their businesses. In the South there were many struggles when it came to segregation and discrimination against african americans. The economy was being rebuilt after it wasnearly destroyed during the civil war and the railways were also. The population was low and it didnt seem like a great place to be during this period. In the midwest there were also labor unions like in the north but they like the north also had many positive things come out of the revolution like there transportation system and their rapid population growth because of immigrants. In the West their transportaion was great with the transcontinental railroad and there economy base was agriculture but they had problems when immigrats from China came in and offered to work for less wages, this threatened everyone elses jobs. If i had to choose a region to live in during this time it would either be the North or Midwest because their economy was booming, the cities were expanding, the population was growing like crazy and it seems like the best places to have been in during that time.</span>
<span>hamilton is benefiting from equality of condition, but frank misperceives it as equality of outcome. Previously
it was considered that the same conditions and results had the same
concepts, however, recent research shows that both are two different
types of equality. <span>These concepts describe the proposed educational positions so that all students are treated equally.
</span></span>
