Answer:
Forgiveness can sometimes help reconcile intercultural problems because, after forgiving, people will no longer be consumed by the wrongs that others have done to them.
Explanation:
Forgiveness can sometimes help reconcile intercultural problems because, after forgiving, people will no longer be consumed by the wrongs that others have done to them. To forgive is not to forget. To forgive someone else you must pass through various phases. It’s not an easy process; but in the end is the most gratifying. By forgiving someone, you no longer hold that grudge that consumed you and you start feeling better and relax. Intercultural relationships are hard because you need to learn everything from the other person (culture wise). You need to put yourself in the shoes of the other person to see and understand the complete picture. And if something goes wrong (or someone gets offended), people need to talk it through and forgive those mistakes if they want to move forward with their relationship.
Answer:
Recovery.
Explanation:
As per the question, the given financial aid exemplifies the 'recovery' step of emergency management as the president's declaration aimed to recuperate with the aftereffects of Hurricane named Katrina by 'allocating the funds of billion dollars to redevelop and rebuild the infrastructure that has been damaged due to the disaster. Thus, this step of financial aid would assist the government to recover the losses and reestablish the area to make it inhabitable for people. Thus, <u>'recovery'</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Autonomy in research deals with individuals making decisions ok whether to participate in a research work or not and their decisions are meant to be duly respected.
However, the autonomy is meant to be reassessed to ensure participants still understand the risks and benefits associated with the research being undertaken so that they weigh their options, interests and for safety reasons.
Answer:
In order to prevent the double jeopardy, the decision to sentence Frank Palko to death by the state of Connecticut was <em>upheld</em> by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Within this the case Palko v. Connecticut (1937) the <u>Fifth Amendment protection was applied</u> in order to protect Frank Palko against double jeopardy. This happened because, Palko was charged with first-degree murder, while he was convicted for a second-degree murder. Former would have led to the death sentence, meanwhile latter to the life imprisonment. Palko was ultimately executed for the 1938 for committing the double first-degree murder.
Answer:
The third one, then the fourth one, then the first one, and last the second one.
Explanation:
3-4-1-2