The option that is an example of the "ethical dilemma" of creating and destroying human embryos is option A: Some people..."believe an embryo has the same moral standing as a human being?"
<h3>What moral dilemmas do embryonic stem cells present?</h3>
The infinite differentiation potential of iPSCs, which can be used for human cloning and pose a risk for the creation of human embryos and human-animal chimeras, is the center of the current ethical debates surrounding stem cell-based therapies.
However, due to the fact that it involves the killing of human embryos, hESC research is morally and politically contentious. The controversy over abortion has a strong connection to the issue of when human existence begins in the United States.
Learn more about human embryos from
brainly.com/question/2625384
#SPJ1
The answer to this question is :
D. Obstacle Evaluation
Answer:
Animals can move, but plants cannot
Explanation:
Locomotion in humans and bipeds is accomplished through walking on legs. In other animals, it can be accomplished through walking on four limbs, flying, or swimming. In cells, cilia and flagella are used to move about. However, since plants are not capable of moving themselves, there is no locomotion of plant species.
Answer:
Organic compounds make up the cells and other structures of organisms and carry out life processes. Carbon is the main element in organic compounds, so carbon is essential to life on Earth. Without carbon, life as we know it could not exist.
Explanation:
Install an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) component, which is a particle control system that helps remove particles from a smokestack by using electrical charges. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, an ESP can remove small particles with up to 99 percent efficiency.
