1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksAgata [21]
3 years ago
5

The FBI has taken the lead in creating a number of Joint Terrorism Task Forces that work around the clock to identify terrorist

threats before they can be carried out and to apprehend those responsible for plotting to commit terrorist acts,
In no fewer than 200-words, explain the benefits and challenges associated with creating and managing a Joint Terrorism Task Force that brings together investigators and resources from a variety of local, county, state, and federal agencies.
Law
1 answer:
Bogdan [553]3 years ago
5 0

The FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces, or JTTFs, are our nation’s front line of defense against terrorism, both international and domestic. They are groups of highly trained, locally based, passionately committed investigators, analysts, linguists, and other specialists from dozens of U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies. When it comes to investigating terrorism, they do it all: chase down leads, gather evidence, make arrests, provide security for special events, collect and share intelligence, and respond to threats and incidents at a moment’s notice.

JTTFs serve as a national resource and create familiarity among investigators and managers before a crisis by conducting frequent training to maintain the specialized skills of investigators, analysts, and crisis response teams. JTTFs pool talents, skills, and knowledge from across the law enforcement and intelligence communities into a single team that responds together.

The task forces coordinate their efforts largely through the interagency National Joint Terrorism Task Force, working out of FBI Headquarters, which makes sure that information and intelligence flows freely among the local JTTFs and beyond.

The first JTTF was established in New York City in 1980. Today there are about 200 task forces around the country, including at least one in each of the FBI’s 56 field offices, with hundreds of participating state, local, and federal agencies.

JTTFs are working around the clock to protect you, your families, and your communities from terrorist attacks.

You might be interested in
Which way should you turn your wheels when parking uphill along a
vagabundo [1.1K]
When headed uphill (or downhill) with no curb, always turn your front wheels to the right so that if your vehicle moves, it will roll off the highway, not into traffic.
6 0
3 years ago
Which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?.
julsineya [31]

The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.

Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.

The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.

learn more about the finance laws here

brainly.com/question/515053

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Kristen is a lawyer. She is representing a in a criminal case prosecuted by an individual with whom she went to high schoolKrist
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

unethical

1. because everyone  should be treated the same as the other.

2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.

3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A defendant filed a complaint against a third-party defendant for contribution permitted under federal law for any environmental
pochemuha

The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.

<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>

A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.

For the given case:

  • The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
  • Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
  • B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
  • Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.

To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here

brainly.com/question/10377896

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
According to the Statute of Frauds, which of the following need NOT be in writing to be enforceable at law
sasho [114]
Primary obligations are not within the statute of frauds and therefore need not be in writing to be enforceable.
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A terrorist groups "Modus Operandi" can be defined as?
    11·1 answer
  • The Privacy Act of 1974 established rules to regulate (c) all personal information, including surveillance data (b) all database
    15·1 answer
  • What role does profit play in a mixed market economy?
    5·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Monster.
    7·2 answers
  • In a class of 54 students there are 6 more girls than boys what is the ratio of the number of boys to the number of girls.
    7·2 answers
  • 1. What Check does the U.S. Senate have on the President?
    6·1 answer
  • Johnny is an inventor, and has recently invented a valuable new microchip . He has a few drinks to celebrate, and while intoxica
    7·1 answer
  • Who is responsible for serving jury duty?
    10·1 answer
  • There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
    5·2 answers
  • According to the United States Supreme Court, how did Ollie's Barbecue engage in interstate commerce?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!