Need a lawyer? There are many problems that require the assistance of legal representation. One example would be a child custody case. These types of cases are civil cases and often require an attorney who is focused on practicing family law.
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects persons and their property from unreasonable searches by the government. In the Kyllo's case, the police obtained evidence of a marijuana growing operation inside Kyllo’s home, by using a thermal imaging device from outside the home. The police used the device to gather evidence to support issuance of a search warrant for the home.
In this case, I as the detective will use thermal imaging to get some details about the stolen items from outside Jasper's house. The evidence provided by this thermal imaging will provide me enough evidence to obtain a search warrant into Jasper's house. Based on the fourth amendment of the constitution, the detective cannot get a search warrant into the defendant's home unless they have provided a convincing evidence that an illegal item is contained in the defendant's house.
Answer:
The second type of encounter occurs when an officer believes there may be some sort of suspicious activity occurring which may justify police involvement.
Explanation:
Answer: rulers they had
Explanation:
This is the answer according to google.
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
