Please help will mark brainliest!

The policy in times of change crosses and surrounds different areas, the square, the streets that the circumscribed, the central institutions like the Cabildo or the sessions of the National Constituent Assemblies, the spaces that open the periodic press, but also the family gatherings, the cafes and the surroundings of the theater, the different services provided in the military contingents. While all that history (although not all),

but in some of those power environments, it has a serious and decisive turning point in the hectic days of the English invasions, it becomes highly visible and audible after the May Revolution of 1810: agitating priests, men of the church holding positions in the National Assemblies, in the drafting of press organs, churches converted into the place of political meeting, of deliberative assemblies.

The overwhelming evidence does not admit implications.1 The question of whether the priests involved in the policy does not matter. And he doesn't have it because it is obvious that they did. A historians specialized in the religious world are not interested then find out

Whether or not they participate in the revolutionary phenomenon. What is really more appropriate is Try to understand that process. If we leave aside the apologetic perspectives that abound in these cases, where in the middle of the scene it can be clearly found a drama and several heroes or antiheroes, and, where, finally, there is no interpretation but Excessively positive or negative ratings, two looks deserve to stand out.

One of the most popular interpretations is the so-called politicization of the clergy.

From this assumption, the scene appears divided, to the extent that it is believed that by a On this subject you can consult with great utility Di Stefano Fabián Herrero

On the one hand there is a fact, the revolution, and on the other hand, a church that can opt for strategies that refer to accession and support, or to others that they prefer instead the questioning and the combat. We are in the presence of actors who arrive at the time revolutionary have to opt. The hypothesis is based, then, on that contingent of Church men who participate in one way or another in the new world that opens the

revolutionary phenomenon.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did the business leaders create new forms of ownership.

Ksivusya [100]

Which business leaders and what forms of ownership

4 0

3 years ago

What battle results in the Delaware river crossing during the winter with a river full of ice that was successful in getting bad

Lana71 [14]

ANSWER:

George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River, which occurred on the night of December 25–26, 1776, during the American Revolutionary War, was the first move in a surprise attack organized by George Washington against the Hessian (German mercenaries in service of the British) forces in Trenton, New Jersey, on the morning of December 26. Planned in partial secrecy, Washington led a column of Continental Army troops across the icy Delaware River in a logistically challenging and dangerous operation. Other planned crossings in support of the operation were either called off or ineffective, but this did not prevent Washington from surprising and defeating the troops of Johann Rall quartered in Trenton. The army crossed the river back to Pennsylvania, this time laden with prisoners and military stores taken as a result of the battle.

Washington's army then crossed the river a third time at the end of the year, under conditions made more difficult by the uncertain thickness of the ice on the river. They defeated British reinforcements under Lord Cornwallis at Trenton on January 2, 1777, and defeated his rear guard at Princeton on January 3, before retreating to winter quarters in Morristown, New Jersey.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers