Answer:
pricing low
yes
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
if either firm charges high, they either earn 11 million or 2 million.
if either firm charges low, it would earn either 15 million or 8 million.
because the payoffs of charging low is higher than the payoffs of charging high, the best strategy is for the firms to charge low if there is no cooperation.
the game is a prisoners dilemma because the choice the firms make isn't the choice that will yield the highest payoffs. the choice that would yield the highest payoffs is to both charge high prices.
Answer:
The disposal resulted was at D. No gain or loss
Explanation:
The gain or loss on disposal on a fixed asset is calculated by comparing the sales proceeds from disposing off the asset and the carrying value of the asset.
The carrying value of the asset is its net book value which is calculated as follows,
Carrying value = Cost - Accumulated depreciation
If the carrying value is equal to the sales proceeds from disposal, there is no gain or loss.
The carrying value of copy machine was = 45000 - 44000 = $1000
The sales proceeds were also $1000
Thus, gain/loss on disposal = 1000 - 1000 = $0
Thus, there was no gain or loss on disposal.
The problem could most likely be a weak hydraulic brake hose.
A weak hydraulic brake hose could cause a spongy pedal. As the pressure builds in the system, the hose may expand and not relay the pressure to the brake units.
Answer:
Income Tax Expense (Dr.) $49,080,000
Deferred Tax Liability (Cr.) $49,080,000
Explanation:
Income tax expense = ( Taxable Income for the year + building and equipment taxable amount + Prepaid Insurance - Liability or contingency Loss ) * Tax rate
Income Tax expense = ( $117,000,000 + $14,700,000 + $2,300,000 - $11,300,000) * 40%
Income Tax expense = $49,080,000
