The some effects of telling the story Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster boy primarily from the perspectives of children is that a less-biased insight into what is happening between the towns and a stronger emphasis on the emotional aspect of the racial conflict.
Turner Buckminster, the son of a minister, has just moved from Boston, Massachusetts to Phippsburg, Maine, and is constantly reprimanded for simple misunderstandings, not to mention that the Phippsburg boys automatically dislike him for that they are bad at baseball. Turner meets a black girl, Lizzie Bright Griffin, who befriends him despite his social difficulties. Turner must save Lizzie's family and friends before they all have to leave, or worse, end up in an asylum in New Gloucester, Maine. But that means confronting the authorities, including Turner's father.
Hence, the correct answers are a less-biased insight into what is happening between the towns and a stronger emphasis on the emotional aspect of the racial conflict.
Learn more about Buckminster on brainly.com/question/1476566
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:............................................
Adverbs usually end in -ly, so Brilliantly = adverb.
There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.
In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.
What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.
Scout, in her mature naivete, states what it means quite succinctly:
In Maycomb, grown men stood outside in the front yard for only two reasons: death and politics. I wondered who had died. Jem and I went to the front door, but Atticus called, "Go back in the house."
The reflects the kind of small-town mentality exhibited throughout the story. Men only call you out into your yard to relay the news of a death, or to express support or disapproval for political candidates and causes. Scout doesn't understand the true nature of the mob appearing (although she will later in the chapter), so she asks "who had died." Atticus clearly does understand, as he orders his children back into the house.
Aunt Alexandra does not directly state her thoughts on Tom's innocence of guilt, but she does express her ideas about Atticus defending him. Scout relates that she heard the end of a conversation between Atticus and Aunt Alexandra, in which Atticus tells her that he's:
". . . in favor of Southern womanhood as much as anybody, but not for preserving polite fiction at the expense of human life," a pronouncement that made me suspect they had been fussing again.
I sought Jem and found him in his room, on the bed deep in thought. "Have they been at it?" I asked.
"Sort of. She won't let him alone about Tom Robinson. She almost said Atticus was disgracin' the family Scout.
Thus, it doesn't really matter to Aunt Alexandra whether or not Tom is innocent, or whether or not he gets a fair trial. All she cares about, as she proves time & time again, is the family name. To her, Atticus' defense of a black man is akin to disgrace for an old, established family like the Finches. Of course, she may truly think Tom deserves a fair trial, but she doesn't want her brother to be the one to ensure he gets it.
Hope this helped! (;
